The expediency of studying the meaning and examples

not considered viable, it is impossible to do so and should therefore be rejected. The expediency of studying the meaning and examples.

The expediency of studying the meaning and examples
The expediency of studying the meaning and examples

The feasibility of an investigation this is an aspect of a research project that is related to whether it can be carried out in real life or not. If the idea of ‹‹the study is not considered viable, it is impossible to do so and should therefore be rejected. The expediency of studying the meaning and examples.

The feasibility of the study has much in common with the available resources for its implementation. Among the different types of resources that may be needed to successfully conduct an experiment or research are, among others, materials, people, and economic or financial.

In other contexts, even time and available information may be considered necessary resources for an investigation. Therefore, in science there must be a balance between the relevance of the subject and the appropriateness of the experiments required for this.

1 Value

1.1 Similar concepts

2 Types of viability

2.1 Technical feasibility

2.2 Economic feasibility

2.3 Temporary expediency

2.4 Ethical expediency

3 Examples of real research

3.1 Construction of a nuclear fusion reactor

3.2 Study of the impact of genetics on the environment

3.3 Zimbardo experiment

4 Links

Value

Viability literally means "the ability to function or sustain oneself over time." In the case of scientific research, this concept is related to the possibility of its implementation in practice or not.

In all branches of science, theoretical developments and speculations in various fields of knowledge should be supported by research conducted by the scientific method. However, sometimes it is very difficult or impossible to carry out these experiments.

This is where the concept of viability begins. In these specific areas of scientific knowledge, researchers need to think about how to carry out a viable experiment, but this allows them to answer the most important questions facing the theoretical development of science.

Similar concepts

Implementation should not be confused with expediency, which is another word that is sometimes used in a way that is practically interchangeable with it. However, in the academic sphere both concepts are differentiated.

Although expediency tries to answer the question "is it possible to conduct this study?", Feasibility tries to find the strengths and weaknesses of an experiment that has already been given in advance.

In this regard, the feasibility should take into account factors such as the relevance of the study in relation to the subject to be studied, the effectiveness of the same and the probability of success of the experiment ..

Types of viability

Within the expediency of the study, you can find different types. The most important are:

Technical feasibility

This is due to the availability of resources needed to conduct an experiment or investigation.

Must Read: Establishing a relationship with the student “ how to make the first ¦ second ¦ seventh step

For example, in the case of neuropsychology, until recently there were no devices needed to measure the functioning of the human brain in real time.

Economic feasibility

Sometimes, although there are the necessary technical means to conduct an investigation, they are very expensive and cannot be implemented.

One example is the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland: the economic effort required to build makes it impossible to develop a second flat device.

Temporary viability

Some types of research must be conducted over many years, sometimes even decades. These studies can be very difficult to perform due to this factor and, therefore, in many cases it is considered that they are not viable.

Ethical expediency

Finally, even if all the necessary resources are available to conduct an investigation, sometimes the methods that should be used to develop it are contrary to ethics or morality. In general, these experiments are discarded.

Examples of real research

The following are examples of several studies that could not be performed due to feasibility issues.

Construction of a nuclear fusion reactor

Although fusion energy has been repeatedly referred to as the final energy, the reality is that its properties have not yet been properly investigated due to the technical impossibility of building a nuclear reactor that produces it in a controlled manner.

However, due to the high temperatures required to begin the process of merging hydrogen atoms with the materials we now have, we cannot repeat this in a controlled environment. This will be a case of lack of technical feasibility.

Study of the impact of genetics on the environment

At a time when the debate over whether humans have a greater impact on our biology or the society in which we live has been proposed, many experiments have been proposed to try to find the answer once and for all. However, most of them can never be implemented.

One of the most radical participants was involved in capturing a large number of newborns and isolating them in a closed environment in which they could not have any contact with an adult. The idea was to provide all the necessary resources for proper development, but to do so without any social impact.

Thus, we could observe how we humans would be if we were not inclined to the society in which we live. But, obviously, the experiment violated the laws of morality and ethics, so it could never be done.

Zimbardo experiment

The last example is an experiment that could have been done in the past, but because of its results it is very likely that we will never be able to reproduce.

This is the famous experiment of Philippe Zimbardo: in this the researcher wanted to study the impact of social roles on people.

To do this, he divided the group of volunteers into two teams: prisoners and prison guards. The idea was to see to what extent the government could corrupt fake guards.

The experiment was to be stopped when the second group got out of control and began using physical violence against volunteers who served as prisoners.

This experiment could no longer be carried out in the modern era, because, again, it violates the rules of ethics and morality.